(Not So) Random Film of the Week: On Her Majesty’s Secret Service

on_her_majestys_secret_service_xlg

Par for the 007 course, that action-packed poster art is a busy hoot of improbability on display, but don’t let that stop you from enjoying a pretty solid flick.

For some strange reason, I’d thought I’d already reviewed this most interesting entry in the long running James Bond film series, but nope, I hadn’t. It’s my favorite film in the franchise for a few reasons and had an ending that’s brilliant for its being completely unexpected for a series known for its figurative “happy endings.” Granted, the film received automatic hatred for decades thanks to it not being a Sean Connery Bond, and some overly harsh criticism of George Lazenby as 007 even though his performance is quite good. Having first seen it as a kid on network TV as a heavily edited version presented out of order and split into two parts over two weeks (WABC was the big and only Bond channel here in NYC for years, so we were stuck with their awful recut versions), I fell right into the story and Lazenby’s more sensitive take on the character despite the clumsy reworked hack job. Okay, okay, Diana Rigg also was a big draw, as I was a huge fan of The Avengers TV series (which REALLY needs a North American Blu-Ray set!) and her always thrilling Emma Peel character.

OHMSS_Diana

I actually had an appropriately witty yet respectable caption for this, but seriously forgot what I was going to type.  A good thing, as pictures like this speak for themselves.

 

OHMSS_Maxwell_Lazenby

Miss Moneypenny (Lois Maxwell) seems to have something on her lip and Bond (George Lazenby) decides to have a closer look. These days, she’d wisely poke him in his cleft chin with the business end of that ballpoint pen while dialing up HR with the other hand.

The film begins with an opening sequence where Lazenby breaks the fourth wall for a sly, self-deprecating joke (I didn’t quite get it as a kid, but later views made it hilarious). On one level, the film is Bond business as usual as he rescues a lovely lady (Diana Rigg), later meets her in a casino, is invited up to her hotel room and is attacked by some guy who means him harm. Soon after this incident, Bond gets waylaid by some thugs who cart him off to meet crime lord Marc-Ange Draco (Gabriele Ferzetti). We soon find out that the lovely lady in question is Contessa Teresa “Tracy” di Vicenzo, Draco’s depressed daughter who keeps trying to do herself in after the death of her mother. Draco makes Bond a surprising offer: marry the Contessa and get a small fortune for his troubles. 007 declines the odd offer but decides to keep a good eye on Tracy for his own reasons: he’s indeed fallen hard for her and there’s a link to Hans Stavros Blofeld (Telly Savalas!) that needs further exploring with Draco’s assistance.

OHMSS_Angela

Angela Scoular as Ruby Bartlett debunking the “girls with glasses don’t get passes” myth.

OHMSS_Telly

“Who loves you, baby?” Well, not YOU, you… evil Dr. Evil precursor!

The Tracy/Bond bonding becomes the major point of the film, but it’s not a Bond film without its assorted diversions major to minor. The overarching story is of SPECTRE cooking up the wild idea of having a dozen gorgeous “Angels of Death” spread the Virus Omega, a deadly crop and animal sterilizing virus around the globe unless a very hefty ransom is paid, he’s labeled with a ridiculous official title and not charged at all for any of his previous (and failed) world domination misdeeds. Posing (somewhat badly) as genealogist Sir Hilary Bray, Bond manages to infiltrate the mountain retreat posing as a clinical allergy-research institute and have his eye-rolling way with a few of the ladies (Angela Scoular, Catherine Schell) before he’s discovered.

Bond escapes (in a great action sequence) and is saved at the last minute by Tracy (who drives like a pro racer, which is a good thing for 007). Lazenby’s performance is quite enjoyable here because he humanizes his Bond into a more likable but still flawed character. He argues with his superiors, disobeys orders to let Blofeld be because his ransom demands will be met and is generally that pain in the rear Connery’s disrespectful 007 was to his employers who somehow seem to know no matter what they say, Bond will go off anyway and do what he pleases because that endgame always plays out the same way each time. OHMSS upends those familiar elements in the most direct and powerful manner possible.

(thanks, Ralph Buskey!)

I won’t spoil the rest of the film for those who’ve yet to see it other than to say the couple end up in Blofeld’s clutches, there’s another escape and excellent chase scene, it’s assumed Blofeld gets bumped off and there’s a big wedding after all (a happy moment except for Lois Maxwell’s poor Miss Moneypenny, I’d say). Also of note is while the film has a few fun gadgets thanks to Q branch, it’s not as reliant on them as with other 007 adventures. They’re there, mind you – they just aren’t as majorly flashy as you might expect. I’d say Bond’s bacon is saved more by his lady love than his borrowed and never returned in working order tech wizardry.

OHMSS_Bray

James Bond: NOT the Master of Disguise (I’d say Dana Carvey would have done a better job, but that’s a bit too much effort for a joke that obvious).

As for the villains, despite his rather unusual ransom plot, Savalas makes a fun enough (and quite athletic) Blofeld, but for my two cents, it’s all Ilse Steppat’s show, period. Her no-nonsense Irma Bunt character outstrips Blofeld on the purely evil front and while her part is smaller, it’s she who has the most important impact on the story. It’s a shame the actress passed away shortly after the film premiered as I’d bet a shiny new penny that she’d have been a bit on the burgeoning convention scene during the 1970’s.

OHMSS_Ilse

Kiss, Kiss, Bang, Bang: Ilse Steppat as Irma Bunt doing her part in altering the future in a not very pleasant manner.

Meanwhile, back at the ranch, this surprise (well, surprise for me because it popped into my head when I finally woke up and was done so quickly despite me being laid up) post is suddenly part of Moon in Gemini’s Winter in July Blogathon, so go pop on over there (Hi, Debbie!) starting July 13 through the 15th for more snowbound or just plain chilly reading thrills. Me? I’m going to go take a rest for a bit and recuperate before bouncing back with some backlog game and movie reviews. Some mojo is back and I’m going to take advantage of that while it lasts.

winter11

Note: That’s pretty much me on the frozen ground there, but a lot less dead. Thanks for reading!

-GW

Advertisements

12 thoughts on “(Not So) Random Film of the Week: On Her Majesty’s Secret Service

    • Yep. I recall reading an unfavorable review years back and wondered what film the reviewer was watching because imo, only the network TV edit was the one to *really* find fault with (the edits and ad breaks really chopped the continuity to shreds).

      Liked by 1 person

  1. Pingback: The Winter In July Blogathon is Here! – MOON IN GEMINI

  2. Pingback: Winter In July Blogathon – Day 1 Recap – MOON IN GEMINI

  3. I can’t claim to be a big Bond fan as I continually get the titles and plots confused (for shame). However, when I finally got around to this one I remember being shocked at how unjustly maligned was George Lazenby. I truly enjoyed his performance and wished he had done more.

    Like

    • I recall reading he only signed on for this one film and let the producers know this early on. That’s interesting because one would think playing Bond a few times would be good for the financial reasons alone. On the other hand, I’d gather he had his reasons for not wanting to continue the role. Oh, and it’s REALLY easy to confuse the plots of these films (especially if you flip through a few Bond books and see how things are altered), so you’re not alone 😀

      Like

  4. Not a big Bond fan, but I’ve seen Lazenby in other projects and always thought he was treated very unfairly by critics. (I may be imagining it, but from the stills it looks like this particular Bond film influenced Mike Myers’ Austin Powers films quite a bit more than some of the others!)

    Thanks so much for your two contributions to the blogathon!

    Like

    • The interesting thing is it makes a pretty good introduction to a more sensitive Bond where he’s less unstoppable than Connery’s take on the character. That and Rigg does a great job in her performance (and her saving the “hero” is a nice twist). I think the Powers films take a lot from a few Bond films, but yep, I did get a chuckle at certain references that popped into my head.

      Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

w

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.